Methodology

Five questions.
Same rubric. Every time.

This rubric was published before the first review went live. It has not changed. Updates require a public changelog entry and re-evaluation of affected products.

Score overview
30%
Clinical dose
25%
Ingredient form
20%
Third-party purity
15%
Value per serving
10%
Label honesty
01

Clinical dose

30% of score

Does each active ingredient meet the minimum effective dose from peer-reviewed clinical trials? We compute per-ingredient doses from proprietary blends using maximum possible allocation. A product cannot score above 7.0 if any primary active is sub-clinical.

02

Ingredient form

25% of score

Is the form of each compound the most bioavailable studied? Magnesium glycinate scores higher than oxide. Creatine monohydrate higher than ethyl ester. We use pharmacokinetic literature — not manufacturer claims.

03

Third-party purity

20% of score

Is the product independently verified for label accuracy, heavy metals, and banned substances? NSF Certified for Sport, Informed-Sport, USP, and equivalents accepted. Manufacturer COAs alone score zero.

04

Value per clinical serving

15% of score

What does one effective dose cost? We calculate cost-per-clinical-serving — not cost-per-label-serving, which often uses sub-clinical doses — and compare within category.

05

Label honesty

10% of score

Does the label overstate effects? Misrepresent evidence? Use structure-function claims that exceed what the literature supports? A product loses points for every instance of unsupported claim.

Score interpretation

9–10
Best in class. All five criteria pass.
7–8.9
Solid. Minor form or value gaps.
5–6.9
Average. One meaningful compromise.
<5
Not recommended. Hard fail on a criterion.